A detailed analysis of the De Bestiis et Aliis Rebus, attributed to Hugh of St Victor, and its relationship to the Latin version of the Physiologus. Includes a list of the known (as of 1938) Physiologus manuscripts, and a comparison of the text of Bestiis with various Physiologus versions. Oddly, Carmody does not appear to recognize Book I of the De bestiis as being the De avibus by Hugh of Fouilloy; instead he calls it a version of the Physiologus.

Language: English

DOI: 10.2307/2848397